<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>Marketocracy Capital Management, LLC</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:advisor.marketocracy.com,2008://7</id>
    <link rel="service.post" type="application/atom+xml" href="/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=7" title="Marketocracy Capital Management, LLC" />
    <updated>2008-06-30T22:50:51Z</updated>
    <subtitle>Information from the Marketocracy advisor to the separately managed accounts.</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 3.2</generator>
 
<entry>
    <title>Managed Account Fees</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/2008/06/management_fees.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=7/entry_id=391" title="Managed Account Fees" />
    <id>tag:advisor.marketocracy.com,2007://7.391</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-28T01:02:06Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-30T22:50:51Z</updated>
    
    <summary> Fees for a Marketocracy mFOLIO Managed Account start at 1.90% per year (Marketocracy Capital Management (MCM)&apos;s advisory fees start at 1.50% and FOLIOfn&apos;s account and brokerage fees start at 0.40%, with a $200 minimum) and is debited monthly from your account based on the average daily asset value. FOLIOfn&apos;s 0.40% annual brokerage fee covers nearly all of the trading costs when the mFOLIOs trade securities or you make changes to your mFOLIO team or buy or sell an mFOLIO...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ken Kam</name>
        <uri>www.marketocracy.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Managed Account" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>
Fees for a Marketocracy mFOLIO Managed Account start at 1.90% per year (Marketocracy Capital Management (MCM)'s advisory fees start at 1.50% and FOLIOfn's account and brokerage fees start at 0.40%, with a $200 minimum) and is debited monthly from your account based on the average daily asset value.
</p><p>
FOLIOfn's 0.40% annual brokerage fee covers nearly all of the trading costs when the mFOLIOs trade securities or you make changes to your mFOLIO team or buy or sell an mFOLIO including commissions on window trades. There may be additional fees for special services, e.g., IRAs, wire transfers out, SRO fees, etc. and if we use market and limit orders. There are break points that lower the FOLIOfn fees as follows:
</p><p>
0.40% of the Daily Assets for the first $500,000
<br />0.30% of the Daily Assets for the amount between $500,000 to $1,000,000
<br />0.20% of the Daily Assets for the amount between $1,000,000 to $3,000,000
<br />0.15% of the Daily Assets for any amount above $3,000,000
</p><p>
MCM's 1.50% annual advisory fee has break points that lowers the fee as follows:
</p><p>
1.50% of the Daily Assets if below $500,000
<br />1.30% of the Daily Assets if between $500,000 to $1,000,000
<br />1.10% of the Daily Assets if between $1,000,000 to $3,000,000
<br />1.00% of the Daily Assets if above $3,000,000 
</p><p>
For a $50,000 account, the total annual fees are 1.90%, which is comparable to the annual expense of an actively managed mutual fund especially when you consider that a mutual fund's expense ratio does not include commissions for the fund's trading.
</p><p>
These managed account fees will not be charged on assets invested in any Marketocracy mutual fund (currently only the Marketocracy Masters 100 Fund symbol: MOFQX).
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Building Your Personal Team</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/2008/06/choosing_a_mix_of_mfolios_2.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=7/entry_id=390" title="Building Your Personal Team" />
    <id>tag:advisor.marketocracy.com,2007://7.390</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-27T23:14:34Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-28T01:15:27Z</updated>
    
    <summary> No single person has the expertise to invest well in every sector across the whole the market. This is why I think that to make money in the market over the long-term you need a team. Each of the mFOLIO Masters is an outstanding investor, but each achieves their results with a distinctive investment style. mFOLIOs can be mixed and matched to personalize your portfolio to give you exposure to&amp;#160; sectors/areas of the market outside of those that you...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ken Kam</name>
        <uri>www.marketocracy.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Managed Account" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>
No single person has the expertise to invest well in every sector across the whole the market. This is why I think that to make money in the market over the long-term you need a team.
</p><p>
Each of the mFOLIO Masters is an outstanding investor, but each achieves their results with a distinctive investment style. mFOLIOs can be mixed and matched to personalize your portfolio to give you exposure to&#160; sectors/areas of the market outside of those that you have the expertise to invest in on your own.
</p><p>
<strong>The Kam Family Team</strong>
</p><p>
If you would like to invest in the same mix of mFOLIOs that I am using for my family, I invite you to invest alongside me.
</p><p>
Currently the Kam Family Blend is invested in the following mFOLIOs:
</p><p><strong>Adam Thompson: </strong>(athompson:TPSNX)
<br /><strong>Chris Rees: </strong>(crees:10STX)
<br /><strong>Randolph McDuff: </strong>(rmcduff:RMG1)
<br /><strong> Timothy Siegel: </strong>(timbo56:SSOF1)
<br />and my <strong>Best Ideas Portfolio</strong> (kenkam:BIP)
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Opening a mFOLIO Managed Account</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/2008/06/open_account.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=7/entry_id=503" title="Opening a mFOLIO Managed Account" />
    <id>tag:advisor.marketocracy.com,2007://7.503</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-17T03:35:49Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-17T03:35:55Z</updated>
    
    <summary> Thank you for your interest in opening a Marketocracy Managed Account to invest in the stocks of the Marketocracy mFOLIO Masters like Randolph McDuff, Chris Rees, and Adam Thompson. There are a few steps to follow and forms to fill out. If you have any questions along the way, feel free to contact us by email, phone or chat (to the right). Here are the steps to get started: STEP 1: Become a Marketocracy Managed Account Client Download the...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ken Kam</name>
        <uri>www.marketocracy.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>
Thank you for your interest in opening a Marketocracy Managed Account to invest in the stocks of the Marketocracy mFOLIO Masters like Randolph McDuff, Chris Rees, and Adam Thompson. There are a few steps to follow and forms to fill out. If you have any questions along the way, feel free to contact us by email, phone or chat (to the right).
</p><p>
Here are the steps to get started:
</p><p>
<strong>STEP 1: Become a Marketocracy Managed Account Client</strong>
</p><p>
Download the following client agreement by clicking on it. This is the client information form and signature page for all of the agreements below. <strong><em>Each</em></strong> account owner or trustee must fill-out and sign their own individual form:
</p><ul>
<li> <strong><em><a href="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/forms/MA-100-001.pdf">Client Agreement for a Managed Account (MA-100-001)</a></em></strong> This form contains the signature page for all of the agreements listed below (you can download and review any of the agreements by clicking on the name of the agreement below).</li>
</ul><p>
<a href="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/forms/MA-100-002.pdf">General Terms and Conditions (MA-100-002) </a>describes the managed account program.
<br /><a href="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/forms/MA-100-006.pdf">Limited Power of Attorney with Trading Authorization (MA-100-006) </a>gives us the authority to establish and trade a brokerage account at FOLIOfn on your behalf.
<br /><a href="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/forms/MA-300-001.pdf">mFOLIO Program Supplement (MA-300-001) </a>supplements the General Terms and Conditions with details specific to managed accounts which are set up at FOLIOfn.
<br /><a href="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/forms/MA-100-004.pdf">Managed Accounts Programs Brochure (MA-100-004) </a>Summary of the program.
<br /><a href="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/forms/MA-100-003.pdf">MCM Form ADV, Part II (MA-100-003)</a> Information about Marketocracy Capital Management, LLC
<br /><a href="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/forms/MA-300-008.pdf">FOLIO</a><em><a href="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/forms/MA-300-008.pdf">fn</a></em><a href="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/forms/MA-300-008.pdf"> Customer Agreement </a>describes FOLIO<em>fn's</em> policies.
</p><p>
<strong>STEP 2: Choose the <a href="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/2008/06/types_of_accounts.html" target="newwindow">type of account</a> your would like at FOLIOfn</strong>
</p><ul>
<li> <strong><em><a href="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/forms/MA-100-007.pdf">Regular Taxable Account (MA-100-007)</a></em></strong> for individual and joint accounts.</li>
<li> <strong><em><a href="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/forms/MA-100-008.pdf">Retirement Account (MA-100-008)</a></em></strong> for Roth IRAs, Rollover IRAs, SEP IRAs, and Traditional IRAs</li>
<li> <strong><em><a href="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/forms/MA-100-009.pdf">Revocable Trust Account (MA-100-009)</a></em></strong> for Living Trust</li>
<li> <strong><em><a href="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/forms/_MA-100-010.pdf">Corporate Account (MA-100-010)</a></em></strong> for Limited Liability Company (LLC), Corporations, Partnerships, etc.</li>
</ul><p>
<strong>STEP 3: Fax us your completed forms</strong>
</p><p>
Download and print the fax cover sheet below and fax back the 3 page <em>Client Agreement for a Managed Account (MA-100-001)</em> from step 1 and the form for the type of account you selected in step 2. Our fax number is 888 777-6181.
</p><ul>
<li> <strong><em><a href="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/forms/Fax_Marketocracy08.pdf">Marketocracy Fax Cover sheet</a></em></strong></li>
</ul><p>
That is it for now. When we receive your fax, we will establish your brokerage account at FOLIOfn. When the account is active, we'll send you information regarding your account, how to access it online, and how to fund it.
</p><p>
<strong>STEP 4: Select the mFOLIO(s) you would like your account to mirror</strong>
</p><p>
You can find information on each individual mFOLIO <a href="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/mFOLIO/">here</a>. We're available to explain each of the mFOLIOs and to discuss whether they are appropriate for your needs and objectives. When you've made your decision fill out this Client Instruction form with your mFOLIO selections:
</p><p style="text-indent:15pt;">
&#8226; <strong><em><a href="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/forms/MA-300-003_.pdf">Initial Client Instruction (MA-300-003)</a></em></strong>
</p><p>






Feel free to contact us via <a href="mailto:info@mcm.marketocracy.com">email</a> or <a href="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/about_us/">phone</a> if you have any questions.
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>The mFOLIO Masters</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/2008/06/the_mfolio_masters.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=7/entry_id=383" title="The mFOLIO Masters" />
    <id>tag:advisor.marketocracy.com,2007://7.383</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-16T17:29:00Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-16T17:34:25Z</updated>
    
    <summary> To select the first group of mFOLIO Masters, I started with Morningstar&apos;s list of the 10 best performing mutual funds over the past 5 years and added the top Marketocracy model portfolios with 5 year track records. When I sorted by 5 year average annual return, there were 21 Marketocracy model portfolios that performed better than the 10th best performing mutual fund. Most of the 21 Marketocracy model portfolios, and ALL of the mutual funds on Morningstar&apos;s list focused...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ken Kam</name>
        <uri>www.marketocracy.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="mFOLIO" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>
To select the first group of mFOLIO Masters, I started with Morningstar's list of the 10 best performing mutual funds over the past 5 years and added the top Marketocracy model portfolios with 5 year track records. When I sorted by 5 year average annual return, there were 21 Marketocracy model portfolios that performed better than the 10th best performing mutual fund.
</p><p>
Most of the 21 Marketocracy model portfolios, and ALL of the mutual funds on Morningstar's list focused on either global resources or real estate. Since these two sectors have had such an amazing run over the past 5 years, I don't think the prospects for either sector is as attractive as it was 5 years ago. However, among the Marketocracy model portfolios, I found seven that delivered comparably impressive returns, but with diversified portfolios. The people who managed these model portfolios are our mFOLIO Masters.
</p><p>
I consider each of these mFOLIO Masters to be a generalist -- meaning each has made a lot of money in more than one sector. I think the good judgement they've exhibited on when to get in and when to get out of different sectors is very rare. In today's market where one month's best stocks are next month's dogs, it is a particularly valuable skill to have on the team. I don't think anyone has a team as impressive as this one. Let me tell you what I found most attractive about each of them.
</p><p>
<strong>Randolph McDuff: </strong><a href="http://m100.marketocracy.com/rmcduff_RMG1/" target="MDS" title="Randolph McDuff" onclick="alert('YOU ARE NOW LEAVING THE MCM WEBSITE');return document.MM_returnValue">(rmcduff:RMG1 Track Record)</a> and <a href="http://m100.marketocracy.com/rmcduff_RMG2/" target="MDS" title="Randolph McDuff" onclick="alert('YOU ARE NOW LEAVING THE MCM WEBSITE');return document.MM_returnValue">(rmcduff:RMG2 Value Catalyst Track Record)</a> Randolph McDuff has one of the longest track records at Marketocracy. For almost 8 years he has navigated his model portfolio using a value approach to go into and out of various sectors and stocks to find pockets of opportunity to beat the market. We consider him a "multi-zone" investor as he is not confined to a single sector of the market. RMG2 VC is a small cap (often micro-cap) oriented portfolio, looking for a specific catalyst to drive performance. RMG1 tends to be larger cap oriented (often foreign companies) where Wall St. analyst coverage is weak and inefficient.
</p><p>
<strong>Chris Rees: </strong><a href="http://m100.marketocracy.com/crees_10STX/" target="MDS" title="Chris Rees" onclick="alert('YOU ARE NOW LEAVING THE MCM WEBSITE');return document.MM_returnValue">(crees:10STX Track Record)</a> Chris Rees has made money on 87% of the stocks he has put into his Marketocracy model portfolio over the last 7-1/2 years. He clearly puts a lot of thought into his decisions before he makes an investment. 10STX or Ten Stocks is the name of his model portfolio and he generally tries to maintain a portfolio of ten positions - each carefully selected as an individual investment but also for their role in the overall portfolio. Surprisingly very diversified for such a small number of positions, Crees also uses cash very effectively. Averaging over 22% in cash but going fully in when the time is right.
</p><p>
<strong>Adam Thompson: </strong><a href="http://m100.marketocracy.com/athompson_TPSNX/" target="MDS" onclick="alert('YOU ARE NOW LEAVING THE MCM WEBSITE');return document.MM_returnValue">(athompson:TPSNX Track Record)</a> Adam made money on 79% of the stocks in his Marketocracy model portfolio indicating that he also does a great job of stock selection. But the most impressive aspect of Adam's track record is that when he picks a winner, he has made 3.82 times as much money on average as he lost when he made a mistake.
</p><p>
<strong>Ian St. Martin: </strong><a href="http://m100.marketocracy.com/ist_martin_ORR/" target="MDS" onclick="alert('YOU ARE NOW LEAVING THE MCM WEBSITE');return document.MM_returnValue">(ist.martin:ORR Track Record)</a> Ian has made money on only 51% of the stocks he has selected over the past 5 years. However, his astute trading enabled him to make more than twice as much on his winners as he lost on the losers.
</p><p>
<strong>Crossy: </strong><a href="http://m100.marketocracy.com/crossy_CIAF/" target="MDS" onclick="alert('YOU ARE NOW LEAVING THE MCM WEBSITE');return document.MM_returnValue">(crossy:CIAF Track Record)</a> Crossy is an IT consultant living in Austria. He leverages his firsthand industry experience and contacts to research companies. He has made money on slightly less than 50% of his stocks, but on the profitable ones he made on average 3 times more money than he lost on the mistakes.
</p><p>
<strong>Jack Weyland: </strong><a href="http://m100.marketocracy.com/jackweyland_VALUE/" target="MDS" onclick="alert('YOU ARE NOW LEAVING THE MCM WEBSITE');return document.MM_returnValue">(jackweyland:VALUE Track Record)</a> Jack combines bottoms-up fundamental research with quantitative analysis that helps him time his trading. During 2007's volatility he has astutely traded the ProShares Trust UltraShort Russell 2000 Index ETF (TWM) which double shorts the Russell 2000 to hedge his portfolio during the downdrafts and made TWM one of his biggest gainers. Jack's trading of Elan Corp. (ELN) brought it onto my radar screen and eventually onto my Best Ideas Portfolio.
</p><p>
<strong>Tim Eriksen: </strong><a href="http://m100.marketocracy.com/teriksen_ESVF/" target="MDS" onclick="alert('YOU ARE NOW LEAVING THE MCM WEBSITE');return document.MM_returnValue">(teriksen:ESVF Track Record)</a> Tim has made most of his money in Energy, Financials, and Consumer Discretionary through a very diversified portfolio. He has shifted towards asset management companies at a good time and has started to get into some banks that have been hit because of their subprime exposure. His 75% winning ratio of making money on 132 out of 174 different companies he has traded over six years is very impressive.
</p><p>
Here are a few more mFOLIOs that we've just added to our lineup:
</p><p>
<strong>Eugene Groysman: </strong><a href="http://m100.marketocracy.com/eugeneg_EMF/" target="MDS" onclick="alert('YOU ARE NOW LEAVING THE MCM WEBSITE');return document.MM_returnValue">(eugeneg:EMF Track Record)</a> 
</p><p>
<strong>Thomas Krouse: </strong><a href="http://m100.marketocracy.com/advisorcfa_AGBF/" target="MDS" onclick="alert('YOU ARE NOW LEAVING THE MCM WEBSITE');return document.MM_returnValue">(advisorCFA:AGBF Track Record)</a> 
</p><p>
<strong> Timothy Siegel: </strong><a href="http://m100.marketocracy.com/timbo56_SSOF1/" target="MDS" onclick="alert('YOU ARE NOW LEAVING THE MCM WEBSITE');return document.MM_returnValue">(timbo56:SSOF1 Track Record)</a> 
</p><p>
<strong>Vadzim Yazvinski: </strong><a href="http://m100.marketocracy.com/dishwasher_VMSF/" target="MDS" onclick="alert('YOU ARE NOW LEAVING THE MCM WEBSITE');return document.MM_returnValue">(dishwasher:VMSF Track Record)</a> 
</p><p>
I do not expect anyone, not even an mFOLIO Master, will deliver the same returns going forward as they've averaged over the the last 5 years because the stocks that did so well for them have appreciated so much that they are no longer as attractive as they were 5 years ago. No one knows what the future holds, but whatever opportunities the future presents, I expect these mFOLIO Masters will use the same good judgement (both stock selection and trading) they've displayed in the past to help us take advantage of them.
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>What Types of Accounts Can I Open</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/2008/06/types_of_accounts.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=7/entry_id=737" title="What Types of Accounts Can I Open" />
    <id>tag:advisor.marketocracy.com,2008://7.737</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-13T19:22:05Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-17T02:00:05Z</updated>
    
    <summary> Individual and Joint Accounts Retirement Accounts Business Accounts Other Accounts INDIVIDUAL AND JOINT ACCOUNTS Individual Individual accounts are owned by one person. If the account owner dies, the account is transferred to the owner&apos;s estate. Revocable Trust Revocable trusts are typically created for individuals, who are then referred to as grantors. The advisor manages the trust&apos;s assets for the grantors and designated trustees - on behalf of the trust&apos;s beneficiaries. The provisions of a revocable trusts can be changed...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ken Kam</name>
        <uri>www.marketocracy.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>
<a href="#ind">Individual and Joint Accounts</a><br>
<a href="#ret">Retirement Accounts</a><br>
<a href="#bus">Business Accounts</a><br>
<a href="#other">Other Accounts</a>
</p>
<A NAME="ind">
<p><strong>INDIVIDUAL AND JOINT ACCOUNTS</strong></a></p>
<DIR>
<strong>Individual</strong><BR>
Individual accounts are owned by one person.  If the account owner dies, the account is transferred to the owner's estate.<BR><BR>

<strong>Revocable Trust</strong><BR>
Revocable trusts are typically created for individuals, who are then referred to as grantors. The advisor manages the trust's assets for the grantors and designated trustees - on behalf of the trust's beneficiaries. The provisions of a revocable trusts can be changed at any time. In addition, the trust can be cancelled.<br><br>

The grantors of the trust receive income from the assets held in the trust. When the grantors die, the property passes to the beneficiaries immediately without having to go through probate court. However, estate taxes will have to be paid on the value of the trust property. In short, a Revocable Trust offers a lot of flexibility without the tax advantages of a Business Trust.<BR><BR>

<strong>Joint</strong><BR>

Joint accounts are owned by more than one person for the benefit of all account owners.  You can only add a FOLIO <i>Advisor</i> client as a joint account owner.<BR><BR>

<strong>Joint - Rights of Survivorship</strong><BR>
Each account owner owns the entire account.  If an account owner dies, the person's share is equally distributed among the remaining account holders.<BR><BR>

<strong>Joint - Tenants in Common</strong><BR>
Each Account owner owns an equal percentage of the account.  If an account owner dies, the person's share is transferred to his or her estate.<BR><BR>

<strong>Joint - Tenants by Entirety</strong><BR>

Account owners must be married. Each owns half the account. If an account owner dies, his or her portion is transferred to their spouse. The following states recognize Tenants by Entirety joint accounts:<BR><BR>
<CENTER>
<TABLE CELLPADDING="2" CELLSPACING="0" BORDER="0" WIDTH="350">
        <TR>
                <TD COLSPAN="2">

        <TABLE CELLPADDING="2" CELLSPACING="0" BORDER="0" WIDTH="300">
        <TR>
                <TD CLASS="ftTblDataDrkTan">Arizona</TD>
                <TD CLASS="ftTblDataDrkTan">Michigan</TD>
                <TD CLASS="ftTblDataDrkTan">Tennessee</TD>
        </TR>
        <TR>
                <TD CLASS="ftTblDataLtTan" BGCOLOR="#E6E6D3">Delaware</TD>
                <TD CLASS="ftTblDataLtTan" BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF">Mississippi</TD>
                <TD CLASS="ftTblDataLtTan" BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF">Vermont</TD>
        </TR>

		<TR>
                <TD CLASS="ftTblDataDrkTan">Florida</TD>
                <TD CLASS="ftTblDataDrkTan">Missouri</TD>
                <TD CLASS="ftTblDataDrkTan">Virginia</TD>
        </TR>
		<TR>
                <TD CLASS="ftTblDataLtTan" BGCOLOR="#E6E6D3">Hawaii</TD>
                <TD CLASS="ftTblDataLtTan" BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF">New Jersey</TD>
                <TD CLASS="ftTblDataLtTan" BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF">Wyoming</TD>
        </TR>
		<TR>
                <TD CLASS="ftTblDataDrkTan">Kentucky</TD>
                <TD CLASS="ftTblDataDrkTan">Oklahoma</TD>
                <TD CLASS="ftTblDataDrkTan">Washington, DC</TD>

        </TR>
		<TR>
                <TD CLASS="ftTblDataLtTan" BGCOLOR="#E6E6D3">Maryland</TD>
                <TD CLASS="ftTblDataLtTan" BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF">Pennsylvania</TD>
                <TD CLASS="ftTblDataLtTan" BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF">&nbsp;</TD>
        </TR>
		<TR>
                <TD CLASS="ftTblDataDrkTan">Massachusetts</TD>
                <TD CLASS="ftTblDataDrkTan">Rhode Island</TD>
                <TD CLASS="ftTblDataDrkTan">&nbsp;</TD>
        </TR>
        </TABLE>
        </TD>
                </TR>
</TABLE>        
</CENTER>
<BR>

<strong>Joint - Community Property</strong><BR>
Account owners must be married. Each owns half the account. If an account owner dies, his or her share is transferred to his or her estate. The property does not automatically transfer to the spouse. The following states recognize Community Property joint accounts:<BR><BR>
<CENTER>
<TABLE CELLPADDING="2" CELLSPACING="0" BORDER="0" WIDTH="350">
        <TR>
                <TD COLSPAN="2">

        <TABLE CELLPADDING="2" CELLSPACING="0" BORDER="0" WIDTH="300">
        <TR>
                <TD CLASS="ftTblDataDrkTan">Arizona</TD>
                <TD CLASS="ftTblDataDrkTan">New Mexico</TD>
        </TR>
        <TR>
                <TD CLASS="ftTblDataLtTan" BGCOLOR="#E6E6D3">California</TD>
                <TD CLASS="ftTblDataLtTan" BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF">Puerto Rico</TD>
        </TR>
		<TR>

                <TD CLASS="ftTblDataDrkTan">Idaho</TD>
                <TD CLASS="ftTblDataDrkTan">Texas</TD>
        </TR>
		<TR>
                <TD CLASS="ftTblDataLtTan" BGCOLOR="#E6E6D3">Louisiana</TD>
                <TD CLASS="ftTblDataLtTan" BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF">Washington</TD>
        </TR>

		<TR>
                <TD CLASS="ftTblDataDrkTan">Nevada</TD>
                <TD CLASS="ftTblDataDrkTan">Wisconsin</TD>
        </TR>
		</TABLE>
        </TD>
                </TR>
</TABLE>        

</CENTER>
<BR>

</DIR>
<A NAME="ret">
<p><strong>RETIREMENT ACCOUNTS</strong></a></p>


<strong>Individual Retirement Account (IRA)</strong><BR>
IRAs are individually owned accounts with tax incentives that encourage saving for retirement.  IRA accounts have strict rules for contributions and distributions.  You can contribute $3,000 a year to a Traditional or Roth in 2003, $4,000 in 2005 and $5,000 in 2008.  Typically, distributions or withdrawals from an IRA account before the owner reaches 59 ½ years of age are subject to a tax penalty.<br><br>
Currently, you cannot open an IRA account at FOLIO <i>Advisor</i> if you are a non-resident alien.
<DIR>

<strong>Traditional IRA</strong><BR>
In a traditional IRA, contributions and earnings are not taxed until the owner takes distributions out of the account. Contributions may be tax deductible. Distributions, usually taken during retirement when the owner's income may be lower, is in most cases taxed as income.<BR><BR>

Account withdrawals made before the owner reaches 59 ½ years old are generally subject to a 10% early withdrawal penalty.<BR><BR>

<strong>IRA Rollover</strong><BR>
Individuals changing jobs can use this account to transfer assets from their previous employer's retirement plan to a new FOLIO<I>fn</I> IRA Rollover account. If proper procedures are followed, no tax penalty will occur.<BR><BR>

<strong>Roth IRA</strong><BR>
In a Roth IRA account, contributions to the account are not deductible. Withdrawals are not taxed as long as the owner meets the program's requirements.<BR><BR>

Money cannot be distributed penalty-free from a Roth IRA until the account has been open for 5 years.<BR><br>

<strong>SEP-IRA (Simplified Employee Pension)</strong><BR>
A SEP-IRA is an employer sponsored retirement plan mostly used by sole proprietorships, partnerships, and small corporations.  Contributions to a SEP-IRA can only be made by an employer and are not considered compensation for the employee.  Contributions and earnings are not taxed until the owner takes distributions out of the account.  LIke a traditional IRA, withdrawals can be made anytime subject to ordinary income tax and a 10% penalty for early withdrawals (currently any withdrawal made before 59&frac12; is considered early).  Contact your employer to find out if you may be eligible for a SEP-IRA plan.<BR><BR>
</DIR>
 

<strong>Custodial  (UGMA/UTMA)</strong><BR>
Custodial accounts are opened for the benefit of a minor.  The account is opened in the minor's name and social security number, but a custodian manages the account for the minor's benefit.  UGMA/UTMA accounts are held in trust until the minor reaches the age of majority.<BR><BR>
If you want to open a custodial account, and the custodian is a non-resident alien, the minor must have a social security number. Otherwise, the custodial account cannot be opened at FOLIO <i>Advisor</i>.<br><br>
Custodial accounts are created in compliance with the Uniform Gifts to Minors Act (UGMA) or Uniform Transfer to Minors Act (UTMA), depending on the legal state of residence.<p></p><br>

<A NAME="bus">
<p><strong>BUSINESS ACCOUNTS</strong></a></p>

<DIR>
<strong>Corporation</strong><br>
Corporate accounts are opened under the name and tax identification number of an incorporated business.

<BR><br>

<strong>General Partnership</strong><br>
General Partnership accounts are opened under the name and tax identification of a general partnership. At least one partner can place trades on behalf of the partnership.
<BR><br>

<strong>Investment Club</strong><br>
Investment Club accounts are opened under the name and tax identification of an investment club. At least one club member can place trades on behalf of the club.
<BR><br>
<strong>Limited Liability Company (LLC)</strong><br>

Limited Liability Company accounts are opened under the name and tax identification of the LLC.
<BR><br>

<strong>Limited Partnership</strong><br>
Limited Partnership accounts are opened under the name and tax identification of a limited partnership. At least one partner can place trades on behalf of the partnership.
<BR><br>

<strong>Sole Proprietorship</strong><br>
Sole Proprietorship accounts are opened under the name of an unincorporated business that is wholly owned by one individual.
</dir>



<A NAME="other">
<p><strong>OTHER ACCOUNTS</strong></a>
</p><p>
<dir>
<strong>Investment Club</strong><BR>

Investment Club accounts can be opened on behalf of investment club clients. The members of the club own the account. The club must have its own tax identification number.<BR><BR>

<strong>Business Trust</strong><BR>
Business trusts are typically created by individuals, who are then referred to as grantors. The trust's assets are managed by designated trustees on behalf of the trust's beneficiaries. The provisions of the trust cannot be changed or terminated by the creators without the agreement of the beneficiaries. All property placed in the trust must stay there. Trustees cannot be replaced unless they die or resign.<br><br>
Any taxes the trust accrues are paid by the trust. When a trustee dies, no estate taxes will be charged on the trust's assets. In short, a Business Trust offers tax advantages without the flexibility of a Revocable Trust.<BR><BR>

<strong>Unincorporated Organization</strong><BR>
Unincorporated Organization accounts are opened under the name and tax identification number of the unincorporated organization, such as a charity, foundation, labor union, government entity, educational institution, or religious group.<BR><BR>
</dir>


</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>About Us</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/2008/06/contact_us.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=7/entry_id=714" title="About Us" />
    <id>tag:advisor.marketocracy.com,2008://7.714</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-05T01:00:32Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-18T02:15:21Z</updated>
    
    <summary> Mailing Address: Marketocracy Capital Management, LLC 1200 Park Place -- Suite 100 San Mateo, CA  94403 Phone: Main: 650 472-2274 Fax: 888 777-6181 My name is Ken Kam. I&apos;m the President of Marketocracy Capital Management, LLC. I could give you the rest of my employment and educational history, but, in my quest to find the best investors in the world, I&apos;ve found such information to be of little value. So, instead, I&apos;d like to tell you what I have...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ken Kam</name>
        <uri>www.marketocracy.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="About Us" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p style="text-align:right;">
<img alt="office.JPG" src="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/office.JPG" width="216" height="162" align="right"/>
</p><p>
<strong>Mailing Address:
<br /></strong>Marketocracy Capital Management, LLC
<br />1200 Park Place -- Suite 100
<br />San Mateo, CA  94403
</p><p>
<strong>Phone:</strong>
<br />Main: 650 472-2274
<br />Fax: 888 777-6181
</p><p>
<img src="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/_images_ken-1.jpg" height="149" width="100" border="1" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt=" Images Ken-1" /> My name is Ken Kam. I'm the President of Marketocracy Capital Management, LLC. I could give you the rest of my employment and educational history, but, in my quest to find the best investors in the world, I've found such information to be of little value. So, instead, I'd like to tell you what I have found to be of value.
</p><p>
When I graduated from the Stanford Business School in 1986, I was convinced that that market was so good at pricing stocks that it would be foolish to try to beat it. So instead of going into investment management, I chose a path that eventually led me to be a founder of a medical-products company.
</p><p>
We developed a cardiac catheter which we took through FDA approval and then manufactured, marketed and sold. We built a successful business, sold it and kept the remainder of the company, which eventually went public.
</p><p>
When the investment bankers came calling, I learned that Wall Street analysts really don't know a lot about the companies they cover. Warren Buffet likes to say that, in the short term, the market is a voting machine. If the people who have the most votes (because their opinions drive billions of dollars of capital) are not the most knowledgeable about the company, how can a stock's price end up being priced exactly right all the time?
</p><p>
I founded Firsthand Funds in 1994 based on the belief that someone with firsthand experience and a network of contacts knew more about their industry than the legions of people hired by Wall Street, most of whom have never worked in the industry.
</p><p>
As a result of my experience in the medical-products industry, I developed an extensive network among the best cardiologists across the country. So when I invested in medical products and pharmaceutical companies while co-managing the Technology Value Fund, I was able to tap into the opinions of the best research team in the world -- the people on the front lines, using and purchasing the products of the companies I was investing in.
</p><p>
I learned that even a bad product in the hands of the best cardiologist could work well and look great in a marketing video to promote a company. Until you test it in the hands of the average cardiologist, you don't know how well a product will really do. And I learned that staff members were the best people to listen to. Nurses aren't paid by product companies, and they see how the products work in the hands of all the doctors. When they give their opinions about a product, I listen.
</p><p>
When I wrote the first prospectus for the Firsthand Technology Value Fund, the SEC made me put the following warning on just about every page: "The portfolio manager has no previous experience managing money."
</p><p>
Needless to say, this made it hard to get anyone to invest in the fund. Almost no one wanted to invest based on the prospectus. The first investors were, by and large, members of my extended family and friends of the family.
</p><p>
Friends and family would not ordinarily provide enough assets to launch a mutual fund, but my grandfather had a lot of friends. When he arrived in Hawaii in 1906, he started out, as many people did, in the fields picking pineapples. After some years, the owners of the plantation made him a manager, and he learned to speak the languages of the different immigrant groups brought in to pick pineapples.
</p><p>
For many of the immigrants, my grandfather was not only their manager, he was also their translator and bridge to other social networks, and thus an important source of help in their efforts to build a better life. My grandfather listened to a lot of their business ideas. He encouraged workers to pool their savings to invest in the best ones and get them started.
</p><p>
It was in this way that many hard working people in Hawaii got their first opportunity to get off the pineapple plantation. And it was these people who years later were the first to invest in a mutual fund where the "portfolio manager had no previous experience managing money."
</p><p>
At the start, the fund's minimum account size was $10,000. When people who pick pineapples for a living invest $10,000 in a mutual fund, the fund manager feels a great responsibility -- at least he should feel a great responsibility. After all, for many of them this was single largest investment of their life aside from their homes.
</p><p>
Under my watch, lasting five years, their money multiplied ninefold. I don't like to toot my own horn, but it seems pertinent to mention that Lipper ranked the fund as the No.1 fund of all mutual funds for the five-year period ending in September 1999.
</p><p>
I cannot begin to describe the satisfaction I felt in delivering such gains to all the friends and family members who had entrusted me with their life savings.
</p><p>
At the end of the 1990s, I began to feel that tech stocks were no longer attractive. I could not, in good conscience, continue to manage a fund that was required to keep their money in tech stocks. So when these people gathered on March 18, 2000 to celebrate my wedding, I told them that I had left Firsthand Funds and that it was time get out of the Technology Value Fund.
</p><p>
As gratifying as my tenure at Firsthand was, it also made me aware of how vulnerable a portfolio is when it is narrowly focused. I could not sleep at night because I worried about what I was going to do when the stocks in my area of expertise were not worth holding.
</p><p>
I don't ever again want to put 100 percent of my portfolio into a single sector, no matter how good it looks. But, I also don't want to diversify so much that it is nearly impossible to deliver great returns.
</p><p>
I think the best way to live up to the trust that investors place in me is to find great stocks whose prospects are independent. That is, the gains in each case will be driven by different factors.
</p><p>
But it is hard for any single investor to master independent factors in diverse industries. Picking the right oil stocks takes a different expertise than what's needed to pick the right biotech stocks, or the right technology stocks. Developing and maintaining expertise in farflung industries is a job that no one can do all by himself.
</p><p>
I know I can't do it by myself. That's why I started Marketocracy. You see, Marketocracy enables me to form the ultimate investment team. I call this team the m100. They are 100 of the most skilled investors I've ever had the privilege to work with -- an All-Star Team!
</p><p>
Members of the m100 have distinguished themselves from a field of tens of thousands running virtual portfolios at Marketocracy.com. Each m100 member has proven his investment skill by building a great multi-year track record. Using the expertise of the m100 team, I can research stocks of every sector and size to build a portfolio that can deliver great returns and span the entire market. In other words, the strategy increases expected return while reducing downside risk.
</p><p>
To manage the Masters 100 Fund, I use the m100 team to find stocks with the potential to double in two years. I set my time horizon at two years because there is not much that a company's management team can do inside of two years to greatly affect the underlying value of the company. I set my sights for doubles because attention is a scarce resource. Keeping my sights set on doubles means that I focus only on developments that have the oomph to make them worth paying attention to.
</p><p>
When I opened the Masters 100 Fund back in November 2001, I recommended it wholeheartedly to my friends and family. I am honored that many of them invested alongside me. There are many other investors in the fund now, but I continue to run the fund with the feeling that I am managing the money of my extended family.
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Lessons From Coin-Tossers</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/2008/06/beating_the_market.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=7/entry_id=718" title="Lessons From Coin-Tossers" />
    <id>tag:advisor.marketocracy.com,2008://7.718</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-02T17:08:54Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-02T17:19:52Z</updated>
    
    <summary> Passive investors often use a thought experiment involving coin-tossers to make the point that you can&apos;t beat the market. It usually goes something like this. Imagine a stadium full of people who each hold a coin. Everyone is asked to toss their coin and those who throw tails are asked to leave. At the end of 10 tosses, there will be a number of people who tossed heads 10 times in a row. Then they ask, would you bet...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ken Kam</name>
        <uri>www.marketocracy.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Articles" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>
Passive investors often use a thought experiment involving coin-tossers to make the point that you can't beat the market. It usually goes something like this. Imagine a stadium full of people who each hold a coin. Everyone is asked to toss their coin and those who throw tails are asked to leave. At the end of 10 tosses, there will be a number of people who tossed heads 10 times in a row. Then they ask, would you bet on these people to toss more than than the average number of heads in the <em>next</em> 10 coin-tosses? Their point is that just as you wouldn't bet on people who have a stellar track record of thowing heads to beat the average in the future. you should not bet on an investment manager, even one with a stellar investment track record, to beat the market.
</p><p>
It sounds persuasive until you realize that once you assume that everyone is tossing a normal coin you've already assumed that there is no skill involved because no one can be "better" at tossing such a coin than anyone else. Dr. Hersh Shefrin, a professor at Santa Clara University, uses a similar thought experiment in his book, Beyond Greed and Fear to reach a very different conclusion. Let me try to explain.
</p><p>
Let’s suppose we have a group of 42,000 people who each receive one of three types of coins - gold, silver, or bronze. The gold coins are weighted so they have a 60% chance of coming up heads. The silver coins are weighted evenly to give a 50% chance of tossing heads. The bronze coins are weighted to come up heads only 40% of the time.
</p><p>
If everyone tossed their coin 10 times, the group of 42,000 people would average 5 heads.  If we want to bet on someone to beat the average of 5 heads out of the next 10 tosses, it would be smart to bet on someone holding a gold coin because each of these people can be expected to throw 6 heads. But, there is one more twist: all the coins are painted green so you can’t tell what kind of coin anyone has. Now, let's see if a track record has any value.
</p><p>
At the start, there are 14,000 people who have a gold coin, 14,000 with a silver coin, and 14,000 with a bronze coin. If you had to choose someone to bet on now, your chances of selecting someone with a gold coin are 33%. But if you wait until after the first coin toss the odds improve to 40%. Here's why. Of the 14,000 people holding gold coins, 60% will throw heads so they will comprise 8,400 of the people still in the stadium after the first toss. Of the 14,000 who hold a silver coin, 50% will throw heads, so 7,000 of them will remain. Of the bronze coin holders, 40% will throw heads accounting for 5,600 of those remaining. After the first toss, there will be 21,000 people in the stadium, but 8.400 of them, 40%, will be holding gold coins.
</p><p>
With each successive toss, the odds of selecting a gold coin holder from the people who remain improve. After the 10th coin toss, there will be 100 people in the stadium. But, 85 of them will have gold coins, 14 will have silver coins and 1 will have a bronze coin. If you select randomly from among the people who threw 10 heads in a row, your chances of picking someone with a gold coin holder are now 85%.
</p><p>
Restricting your choices to those with a track record of throwing 10 heads in a row greatly increases your odds of selecting a gold coin holder who can then be expected to throw 6 heads in the next 10 tosses and thus beat the average of all 42,000 which will be 5.
</p><p>
Since many who hold gold coins will not throw 6 heads in the next 10 tosses, even though they can be expected to, there is a good argument to choose all 100 of the people who threw 10 heads in a row. The expected performance of the entire group of 100 in the next 10 tosses is 5.84. By choosing all 100, the probability of the group averaging more than 5 is higher than if you just choose a single person with a gold coin.
</p><p>
I don't mean to imply that anyone should select managers based solely on their past performance. Investing is a lot harder than tossing coins. But if investing requires skill, then track records are a useful tool for finding those who are skilled.
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Luck vs Skill</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/2008/06/luck_vs_skill.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=7/entry_id=717" title="Luck vs Skill" />
    <id>tag:advisor.marketocracy.com,2008://7.717</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-02T16:05:33Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-02T16:10:31Z</updated>
    
    <summary> In concept, an investor has a universe of stocks from which to select a portfolio. If an investor’s portfolio delivers a higher return than a portfolio consisting of the entire universe of stocks, then the excess return — also known as “alpha&quot; — can be attributed to the investor’s skill. Investors who don’t deliver alpha can be excluded from further consideration. Of the investors who generated alpha, it is certainly possible that any of them could just be lucky....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ken Kam</name>
        <uri>www.marketocracy.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Articles" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>
In concept, an investor has a universe of stocks from which to select a portfolio. If an investor’s portfolio delivers a higher return than a portfolio consisting of the entire universe of stocks, then the excess return — also known as “alpha" — can be attributed to the investor’s skill. Investors who don’t deliver alpha can be excluded from further consideration. 
<br /> 
<br />Of the investors who generated alpha, it is certainly possible that any of them could just be lucky. However, the larger the alpha, and the longer the track record, the less likely that is the case.  And, because we have so much more data, we have developed other metrics that increase our confidence that we are finding skill. 
</p><p>
<strong>Improving Confidence</strong>
</p><p>
At the heart of it all, skilled investors have to do two things well — pick the right stocks, and trade them well. 
</p><p>
To tell us whether an investor is skilled at picking stocks, we use a metric we call the winning percentage. It is simply the number of profitable stocks divided by the total number of stocks that an investor has ever put into their model portfolio. An investor with a winning percentage of 85% is someone who puts a lot of effort into stock selection and is doing a very good job. 
</p><p>
To determine whether an investor is skilled at trading we use a metric we call the average gain to average loss ratio. We calculate it by taking the average gain from all the winners and dividing by the average loss from all the losers. A ratio of 2 means that the investor makes twice as much money when they are right about a stock as they lose when they are wrong. This investor is doing a good job of selling the losers before the losses become large, while also letting the winners run. 
</p><p>
<strong>Putting it Together</strong>
</p><p>
Consider two investors who each delivered the same alpha over the last five years. Many would say they are equally skilled but also equally likely to be lucky. 
</p><p>
But, what if I told you that one investor’s alpha came from a single trade (buying Google at its IPO) and the other made hundreds of trades of which 85% of the stocks were profitable, and the average gain to average loss ratio was 2? Would this information change your confidence in one versus the other? 
</p><p>
It does for me. Although we use alpha as a measure of skill, it is not a good estimate of future returns because it is the result of past opportunities that may no longer be available. We should not expect that future opportunities will be the same as in the past. 
</p><p>
However, a winning ratio of 85% and an average gain to average loss ratio of 2 tells us that the investor has good judgment about stock selection and trading decisions. I have more confidence that the investor will apply the same judgment in the future as in the past, than that he will achieve comparable alpha.
</p><p>
It is metrics like these (and others) that go well beyond what is typically available about mutual fund managers that improve our confidence that the investors we are selecting are skilled.  
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Exploring For Higher Returns</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/2008/05/exploring_and_find_higher_retu.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=7/entry_id=713" title="Exploring For Higher Returns" />
    <id>tag:advisor.marketocracy.com,2008://7.713</id>
    
    <published>2008-05-29T16:48:48Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-29T21:08:07Z</updated>
    
    <summary> If you&apos;re like a lot of people, you&apos;ve got most of your portfolio tucked into a broadly diversified core fund. That&apos;s a sensible approach. But what if the returns are not enough to meet your financial objectives? The usual advice these days is to put off retirement -- or cut spending to the bone so you can put additional income or savings into your portfolio. That&apos;s good advice as far as it goes. But it&apos;s not very satisfying. There&apos;s...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ken Kam</name>
        <uri>www.marketocracy.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Explore" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>
If you're like a lot of people, you've got most of your portfolio tucked into a broadly diversified <a href="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/core_fund/">core fund</a>. That's a sensible approach. But what if the returns are not enough to meet your financial objectives?
</p><p>
The usual advice these days is to put off retirement -- or cut spending to the bone so you can put additional income or savings into your portfolio. That's good advice as far as it goes. But it's not very satisfying.
</p><p>
There's another option that should be considered. That's putting some of your assets into an "explore" portfolio. How much? That depends on your confidence in selecting the right areas to invest in, and in the skill of the person, whether it’s yourself or a manager, who will be picking the stocks. There are no guarantees, of course, but if your other choices are working longer or reducing your standard of living, an explore portfolio should at least be on the table.
</p><p>
<strong>Even in bad markets some stocks do well</strong>
</p><p>
Although the overall market has not done well so far this decade some sectors of the market have delivered solid returns. When the returns are due to factors that are ongoing and long-lasting, there is the possibility that those solid returns are not yet exhausted. Those are the areas that are worth exploring for higher returns.
</p><p>
Managing an explore portfolio requires significant industry expertise and a network of industry contacts to separate the winners from the losers. This is why we recommend that if you want to manage your own explore portfolio, you focus on an industry in which you have significant firsthand experience. If you want to explore in other industries, we recommend you hire the most skilled manager you can find to help you.
</p><p>
Through our <a href="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/managed_account/" title="managed account">managed account</a> program you can access Marketocracy's <a href="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/mFOLIO/">mFOLIO Masters</a> – m100 members that we have evaluated enough that we believe their model portfolio can stand alone.
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Lessons From Coin-Flipping</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/2008/05/lessons_from_coinflipping.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=7/entry_id=711" title="Lessons From Coin-Flipping" />
    <id>tag:advisor.marketocracy.com,2008://7.711</id>
    
    <published>2008-05-29T00:31:50Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-29T00:42:54Z</updated>
    
    <summary> This thought experiment is adapted from Hersh Shefrin&apos;s book &quot;Beyond Greed and Fear.&quot; Imagine 42,000 people in a stadium are each given one of three types of coins - gold, silver, or bronze. The gold coins are weighted to come up heads 60% of the time, the silver coins 50%, and the bronze coins only 40%. If everyone tossed their coin 10 times, the group of 42,000 would average 5 heads.  If we want to bet on someone to...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ken Kam</name>
        <uri>www.marketocracy.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>
This thought experiment is adapted from Hersh Shefrin's book "Beyond Greed and Fear."
</p><p>
Imagine 42,000 people in a stadium are each given one of three types of coins - gold, silver, or bronze. The gold coins are weighted to come up heads 60% of the time, the silver coins 50%, and the bronze coins only 40%.
</p><p>
If everyone tossed their coin 10 times, the group of 42,000 would average 5 heads.  If we want to bet on someone to beat the average in the next 10 tosses, it would be smart to bet on someone holding a gold coin because each of these people can be expected to throw 6 heads. But, there is one more twist: all the coins are painted green so you can't tell what kind of coin anyone has.
</p><p>
At the start, there are 14,000 people who have a gold coin, 14,000 with a silver coin, and 14,000 with a bronze coin. If you had to choose someone to bet on at this point, your chances of selecting someone with a gold coin are 33%. But if you wait until after the first coin toss the odds improve to 40%. Here's why.
</p><p>
Of the 14,000 people holding gold coins, 60% will throw heads so they will comprise 8,400 of the people still in the stadium after the first coin-flip. Of the 14,000 who hold a silver coin, 50% will throw heads, so 7,000 of them will remain. Of the bronze coin holders, 40% will throw heads accounting for 5,600 of those remaining. After the first coin-flip, there will be 21,000 people in the stadium, but 8.400 of them, 40%, will be holding gold coins.
</p><p>
With each successive coin-flip, the odds of selecting a gold coin holder from the people who remain improve. After the 10th coin-flip, there will be 100 people in the stadium. But, 85 of them will have gold coins, 14 will have silver coins and 1 will have a bronze coin. If you select randomly from among the people who threw 10 heads in a row, your chances of picking someone with a gold coin holder are now 85%.
</p><p>
Restricting your choices to those with a track record of throwing 10 heads in a row greatly increases your odds of selecting a gold coin holder who can then be expected to throw 6 heads in the next 10 tosses beating the average of all 42,000 which will be 5.
</p><p>
Since many who hold gold coins will not throw 6 heads in the next 10 tosses, even though they can be expected to, there is a good argument to choose all 100 of the people who threw 10 heads in a row.
</p><p>
In the next 10 coin-flips the entire group of 42,000 is expected to average 5 heads. But among the 100 who previously threw 10 consecutive heads, the expected average is 5.84.
</p><p>
Based on their track record, these 100 can be expected to outperform everyone, even though they include 15 who don't have gold coins, and none of them is expected to throw 10 heads in a row again. By choosing all 100, the probability of the group averaging more than 5 is higher than if you just choose a single person with a gold coin.
</p><p>
When it comes to investing, we could never be as confident about beating the market. Nevertheless this thought experiment has three lessons for us.
</p><p>
First, we are not looking for the one person with the best track record. We are looking for a group.
</p><p>
Second, we don't have to be right about every manager we select for the group. Randomness will ensure that some lucky people produce a good enough track record to appear skilled. We have to set our standards high enough so we can be confident that most of the lucky ones wash out, leaving us with a group that is largely made up of the skilled.
</p><p>
Third, in order to outperform an index fund, the group as a whole has to do better than the average investor, but none of the managers has to repeat their stellar returns.
</p><p>
<strong>Back to Investing</strong>
</p><p>
When it comes to investors, throwing heads is analogous to generating alpha. In concept, an investor has a universe of stocks from which to select a portfolio. If an investor's portfolio delivers a higher return than a portfolio consisting of the entire universe of stocks, then the excess return (alpha) can be attributed to the investor's skill. Investors who don't deliver alpha can be excluded from further consideration. As in the coin-flipping analogy, these people can leave the stadium.
</p><p>
Of the investors who generated alpha, it is certainly possible that any of them could just be lucky. However, the larger the alpha, and the longer the track record, the less likely that is the case.  And, when we are talking about investors instead of coin-flippers, other metrics can increase our confidence that we are finding skill.
</p><p>
<strong>Improving Confidence</strong>
</p><p>
At the heart of it all, skilled investors have to do two things well &#38;#8212; pick the right stocks, and trade them well.
</p><p>
To tell us whether an investor is skilled at picking stocks, we use a metric we call the winning percentage. It is simply the number of profitable stocks divided by the total number of stocks that an investor has ever put into their model portfolio. An investor with a winning percentage of 85% is someone who puts a lot of effort into stock selection and is doing a very good job.
</p><p>
To determine whether an investor is skilled at trading we use a metric we call the average gain to average loss ratio. We calculate it by taking the average gain from all the winners and dividing by the average loss from all the losers. A ratio of 2 means that the investor makes twice as much money when they are right about a stock as they lose when they are wrong. This investor is doing a good job of selling the losers before the losses become large, while also letting the winners run.
</p><p>
<strong>Putting it Together</strong>
</p><p>
Consider two investors who each delivered the same alpha over the last five years. Many would say they are equally skilled but also equally likely to be lucky.
</p><p>
But, what if I told you that one investor's alpha came from a single trade (buying Google at its IPO) and the other made hundreds of trades of which 85% of the stocks were profitable, and the average gain to average loss ratio was 2? Would this information change your confidence in one versus the other?
</p><p>
It does for us. Although we use alpha as a measure of skill, it is not a good estimate of future returns because it is the result of past opportunities that may no longer be available. We should not expect that future opportunities will be the same as in the past.
</p><p>
However, a winning ratio of 85% and an average gain to average loss ratio of 2 tells us that the investor has good judgment about stock selection and trading decisions. We have more confidence that the investor will apply the same judgment in the future as in the past, than that he will achieve comparable alpha.
</p><p>
It is metrics like these (and others) that go well beyond what is typically available about mutual fund managers that improve our confidence that the investors we are selecting are skilled.
</p><p>
<strong>Putting Theory Into Practice</strong>
</p><p>
From our coin-flipping analogy we learned that if we want to outperform an index fund, our chances are better if we use a team of skilled investors rather than just choosing the one with the best track record. Our data shows that skilled investors exist, but they are rare. Based on our analysis and, after additional due diligence, we have selected and signed research contracts with roughly 500 investors who have demonstrated a high level of skillfulness. It is from this group that we select our research team, which we call the "m100".
</p><p>
Our coin-flipping analogy also teaches us that no matter how good someone's track record looks, there will inevitably be some lucky people mixed in with the skilled ones. For this reason, when we select someone for the m100, we make it clear from the outset that ongoing membership is at our discretion. This arrangement allows us to correct mistakes, and gives us more flexibility than any other firm to change our research team as the landscape of market opportunities changes.
</p><p>
Finally, just as none of the 100 coin-flippers needs to throw 10 heads in a row a second time in order to for the group to beat all 42,000 people in the stadium, none of the m100 has to repeat their stellar performance in order for the m100 to outperform an index fund. If the m100 possesses above-average skill, we can be confident that, over a reasonable investment horizon, they will outperform the average investor -- which is what an index fund will mirror.
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Who is Ken Kam?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/2008/05/ken_kam.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=7/entry_id=307" title="Who is Ken Kam?" />
    <id>tag:advisor.marketocracy.com,2007://7.307</id>
    
    <published>2008-05-28T22:15:06Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-30T00:02:32Z</updated>
    
    <summary> I&apos;m the President of Marketocracy Capital Management, LLC. I could give you the rest of my employment and educational history, but, in my quest to find the best investors in the world, I&apos;ve found such information to be of little value. So, instead, I&apos;d like to tell you what I have found to be of value. When I graduated from the Stanford Business School in 1986, I was convinced that that market was so good at pricing stocks that...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ken Kam</name>
        <uri>www.marketocracy.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>
I'm the President of Marketocracy Capital Management, LLC. I could give you the rest of my employment and educational history, but, in my quest to find the best investors in the world, I've found such information to be of little value. So, instead, I'd like to tell you what I have found to be of value.
</p><p>
When I graduated from the Stanford Business School in 1986, I was convinced that that market was so good at pricing stocks that it would be foolish to try to beat it. So instead of going into investment management, I chose a path that eventually led me to be a founder of a medical-products company.
</p><p>
We developed a cardiac catheter which we took through FDA approval and then manufactured, marketed and sold. We built a successful business, sold it and kept the remainder of the company, which eventually went public.
</p><p>
When the investment bankers came calling, I learned that Wall Street analysts really don't know a lot about the companies they cover. Warren Buffet likes to say that, in the short term, the market is a voting machine. If the people who have the most votes (because their opinions drive billions of dollars of capital) are not the most knowledgeable about the company, how can a stock's price end up being priced exactly right all the time?
</p><p>
I founded Firsthand Funds in 1994 based on the belief that someone with firsthand experience and a network of contacts knew more about their industry than the legions of people hired by Wall Street, most of whom have never worked in the industry.
</p><p>
As a result of my experience in the medical-products industry, I developed an extensive network among the best cardiologists across the country. So when I invested in medical products and pharmaceutical companies while co-managing the Technology Value Fund, I was able to tap into the opinions of the best research team in the world -- the people on the front lines, using and purchasing the products of the companies I was investing in.
</p><p>
I learned that even a bad product in the hands of the best cardiologist could work well and look great in a marketing video to promote a company. Until you test it in the hands of the average cardiologist, you don't know how well a product will really do. And I learned that staff members were the best people to listen to. Nurses aren't paid by product companies, and they see how the products work in the hands of all the doctors. When they give their opinions about a product, I listen.
</p><p>
When I wrote the first prospectus for the Firsthand Technology Value Fund, the SEC made me put the following warning on just about every page: "The portfolio manager has no previous experience managing money."
</p><p>
Needless to say, this made it hard to get anyone to invest in the fund. Almost no one wanted to invest based on the prospectus. The first investors were, by and large, members of my extended family and friends of the family.
</p><p>
Friends and family would not ordinarily provide enough assets to launch a mutual fund, but my grandfather had a lot of friends. When he arrived in Hawaii in 1906, he started out, as many people did, in the fields picking pineapples. After some years, the owners of the plantation made him a manager, and he learned to speak the languages of the different immigrant groups brought in to pick pineapples.
</p><p>
For many of the immigrants, my grandfather was not only their manager, he was also their translator and bridge to other social networks, and thus an important source of help in their efforts to build a better life. My grandfather listened to a lot of their business ideas. He encouraged workers to pool their savings to invest in the best ones and get them started.
</p><p>
It was in this way that many hard working people in Hawaii got their first opportunity to get off the pineapple plantation. And it was these people who years later were the first to invest in a mutual fund where the "portfolio manager had no previous experience managing money."
</p><p>
At the start, the fund's minimum account size was $10,000. When people who pick pineapples for a living invest $10,000 in a mutual fund, the fund manager feels a great responsibility -- at least he should feel a great responsibility. After all, for many of them this was single largest investment of their life aside from their homes.
</p><p>
Under my watch, lasting five years, their money multiplied ninefold. I don't like to toot my own horn, but it seems pertinent to mention that Lipper ranked the fund as the No.1 fund of all mutual funds for the five-year period ending in September 1999.
</p><p>
I cannot begin to describe the satisfaction I felt in delivering such gains to all the friends and family members who had entrusted me with their life savings.
</p><p>
At the end of the 1990s, I began to feel that tech stocks were no longer attractive. I could not, in good conscience, continue to manage a fund that was required to keep their money in tech stocks. So when these people gathered on March 18, 2000 to celebrate my wedding, I told them that I had left Firsthand Funds and that it was time get out of the Technology Value Fund.
</p><p>
As gratifying as my tenure at Firsthand was, it also made me aware of how vulnerable a portfolio is when it is narrowly focused. I could not sleep at night because I worried about what I was going to do when the stocks in my area of expertise were not worth holding.
</p><p>
I don't ever again want to put 100 percent of my portfolio into a single sector, no matter how good it looks. But, I also don't want to diversify so much that it is nearly impossible to deliver great returns.
</p><p>
I think the best way to live up to the trust that investors place in me is to find great stocks whose prospects are independent. That is, the gains in each case will be driven by different factors.
</p><p>
But it is hard for any single investor to master independent factors in diverse industries. Picking the right oil stocks takes a different expertise than what's needed to pick the right biotech stocks, or the right technology stocks. Developing and maintaining expertise in farflung industries is a job that no one can do all by himself.
</p><p>
I know I can't do it by myself. That's why I started Marketocracy. You see, Marketocracy enables me to form the ultimate investment team. I call this team the m100. They are 100 of the most skilled investors I've ever had the privilege to work with -- an All-Star Team!
</p><p>
Members of the m100 have distinguished themselves from a field of tens of thousands running virtual portfolios at Marketocracy.com. Each m100 member has proven his investment skill by building a great multi-year track record. Using the expertise of the m100 team, I can research stocks of every sector and size to build a portfolio that can deliver great returns and span the entire market. In other words, the strategy increases expected return while reducing downside risk.
</p><p>
To manage the Masters 100 Fund, I use the m100 team to find stocks with the potential to double in two years. I set my time horizon at two years because there is not much that a company's management team can do inside of two years to greatly affect the underlying value of the company. I set my sights for doubles because attention is a scarce resource. Keeping my sights set on doubles means that I focus only on developments that have the oomph to make them worth paying attention to.
</p><p>
When I opened the Masters 100 Fund back in November 2001, I recommended it wholeheartedly to my friends and family. I am honored that many of them invested alongside me. There are many other investors in the fund now, but I continue to run the fund with the feeling that I am managing the money of my extended family.
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Searching For Skilled Investors</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/2008/05/searching_for_skilled_investor.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=7/entry_id=710" title="Searching For Skilled Investors" />
    <id>tag:advisor.marketocracy.com,2008://7.710</id>
    
    <published>2008-05-28T12:22:21Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-02T17:14:32Z</updated>
    
    <summary> We all dream of finding the next Warren Buffet. But, skilled investors are rare. If you want to know if the person managing your money is skilled, the most important thing you should ask for is their track record. As surprising as this may sound, very few people in the investment industry can tell you their track record. Mutual funds have track records, but managers do not. Out of almost 11,000 mutual funds, roughly 70% have changed their managers...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ken Kam</name>
        <uri>www.marketocracy.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Main" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>
We all dream of finding the next Warren Buffet. But, skilled investors are rare. If you want to know if the person managing your money is skilled, the most important thing you should ask for is their track record. As surprising as this may sound, very few people in the investment industry can tell you their track record.
</p><p>
Mutual funds have track records, but managers do not. Out of almost 11,000 mutual funds, roughly 70% have changed their managers in the last 5 years. When this happens, the fund's long-term track record no longer reflects the skill of the current manager.
</p><p>
When you invest in a mutual fund, the person who will manage your money is the current manager, not the one that left. In our opinion, it's more than a little deceptive for a mutual fund to advertise a long-term track record if the manager who generated most of the returns is no longer there. If you don't know the current manager's track record, it's impossible to say whether the next Warren Buffet is managing your money, or someone who is at best unproven. And, there is no good reason to entrust your financial future to someone who is unproven.
</p><p>
We started Marketocracy to let managers, analysts, and everyone else establish their own track record so we could identify the skilled investors we all want to have managing our money. We do this through a website that enables anyone to manage a model portfolio that is priced each day as if it were a mutual fund. The big difference? The manager that started the fund's track record is the same one managing it today.
</p><p>
Since we started, more than 100,000 people have set up a model portfolio. There are now over 30,000 whose track records are more than 5 years old, and we have signed research contracts with about 500 whom we consider to be the most <a href="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/2008/06/luck_vs_skill.html">skilled</a>. We use this unique pool of investing talent to manage money for clients who want to <a href="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/2008/06/beating_the_market.html">beat the market</a>.
</p><p>
Our <a href="http://www.masters100fund.com" onclick="GP_popupConfirmMsg('YOU ARE NOW LEAVING THE ADVISOR.MARKETOCRACY.COM WEBSITE');return document.MM_returnValue">mutual fund</a> is designed for the <a href="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/core_fund/">core</a> of your portfolio where reducing risk through diversification has a higher priority than maximizing returns. To manage a <a href="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/core_fund/">core fund</a>, we select what we believe will be the right team at the right time – we call them the m100. Of course, we’re not perfect and the world can change quickly so when that happens, we adjust the team. The breadth and depth of our bench of talent, our insight on their strengths and weaknesses, and the flexibility we have in managing our team gives us a tremendous advantage for correcting our mistakes and changing our team to meet the opportunities the market gives us.
</p><p>
Our <a href="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/mFOLIO/">mFOLIOs</a> are designed for the <a href="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/explore/">explore</a> portion of your portfolio where maximizing returns is more important than reducing risk. <a href="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/mFOLIO/">mFOLIO Masters</a> are m100 members that we have evaluated enough that we believe their model portfolio can stand alone. mFOLIOs are professionally managed portfolios that give you access to the best at Marketocracy through a <a href="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/managed_account/">managed account</a> at FOLIOfn.
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>The Right Benchmark</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/2008/05/the_right_benchmark.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=7/entry_id=709" title="The Right Benchmark" />
    <id>tag:advisor.marketocracy.com,2008://7.709</id>
    
    <published>2008-05-28T02:02:10Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-28T02:07:41Z</updated>
    
    <summary> Ken Kam responds to the questions posed be Ian Post and Brent Bentrim. Click here to read the response....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ken Kam</name>
        <uri>www.marketocracy.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="ActivePassiveDebate" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>
Ken Kam responds to the questions posed be Ian Post and Brent Bentrim. <a href="http://www.advisorperspectives.com/newsletters08/LTE-Identifying_Skillful_Managers.html">Click here</a> to read the response.
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Examining Marketocracy&apos;s Evidence</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/2008/05/examining_marketocracy_evidenc.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=7/entry_id=708" title="Examining Marketocracy's Evidence" />
    <id>tag:advisor.marketocracy.com,2008://7.708</id>
    
    <published>2008-05-28T01:54:22Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-28T02:00:14Z</updated>
    
    <summary> Two other advisors, Ian Post and Bent Bentrim join the debate. Click here to read their letters....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ken Kam</name>
        <uri>www.marketocracy.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="ActivePassiveDebate" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>
Two other advisors, Ian Post and Bent Bentrim join the debate. <a href="http://www.advisorperspectives.com/newsletters08/LTE-Coin_Flipping_and_the_Search_for_Alpha.html">Click here</a> to read their letters.
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>The Search For Alpha</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/2008/05/the_search_for_alpha.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=7/entry_id=707" title="The Search For Alpha" />
    <id>tag:advisor.marketocracy.com,2008://7.707</id>
    
    <published>2008-05-28T01:48:46Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-28T01:54:17Z</updated>
    
    <summary> Ken Kam explains how Marketocracy examines track records to identify and harness skilled investors. Click here to read the response....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ken Kam</name>
        <uri>www.marketocracy.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="ActivePassiveDebate" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://advisor.marketocracy.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>
Ken Kam explains how Marketocracy examines track records to identify and harness skilled investors. <a href="http://www.advisorperspectives.com/newsletters08/Coin_Flipping-The_Search_for_Alpha.html">Click here</a> to read the response.
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed> 

